Why You Can’t Afford Groceries: The Illusion of “Inflation”

I want to talk to you about something that hits every single one of us the moment we walk through the automatic sliding doors of a grocery store. It is that sinking feeling in your stomach as you look at a receipt for a handful of basic human necessities—bread, milk, eggs, perhaps some poultry—and realize that a substantial portion of your day’s wages has just evaporated.

For the past four years, we have been subjected to a relentless, ubiquitous economic narrative. The story goes that unprecedented supply chain disruptions, a historic global pandemic, unpredictable weather events, and geopolitical conflicts have inevitably driven up the cost of living. We have watched our purchasing power disappear, and when we ask why, we are told that “inflation” is a natural, unavoidable macroeconomic phenomenon. Between 2021 and 2023, consumer prices in the United States alone rose by more than 20 percent, with successive jumps of 7 percent in 2021, 6.5 percent in 2022, and 3.4 percent in 2023.¹ Globally, the situation is even more dire, with food insecurity climbing to catastrophic levels.²

But I want to share my deep, unfiltered thoughts with you, stripped of the corporate public relations spin. Before I began writing about broader human issues and society, I spent 17 years in corporate Human Resources. I have sat in the executive boardrooms. I have helped design the compensation structures, the Annual Incentive Plans (AIPs), and the key performance indicators (KPIs) that dictate how the world’s largest companies behave. I understand corporate human behavior because I used to build the invisible architecture that guides it.

When you look at the objective reality of the global food market today, the prevailing narrative of unavoidable, organic inflation begins to fall apart. It is, in large part, an illusion carefully curated to mask what economists technically define as “asymmetric price transmission” and what the public rightfully calls “greedflation.”

My core philosophy is simple: I stand for fairness and the rule of law. I judge every situation based on objective right and wrong, not blind tribalism. And what is happening in the global food supply chain right now is fundamentally wrong. If global food manufacturers and agricultural conglomerates were merely passing along the increased costs of raw materials, energy, and labor to consumers, their gross profit margins would, at best, remain flat. In a truly competitive market absorbing macroeconomic shocks, those margins would likely compress. Instead, the world’s largest food monopolies and fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) giants are reporting record-breaking gross margins, historic dividend payouts, and windfall profits.³

Cost shocks—whether from a localized avian flu outbreak, the war in Ukraine, or regional droughts—are no longer merely absorbed or passed on. They are aggressively weaponized as coordinating mechanisms to extract wealth from the working and middle classes.⁶ This report is a deep dive into that weaponization. We are going to expose how global food monopolies are posting record profits while claiming that supply chain issues are forcing them to raise prices on basic human necessities.

The Macroeconomic Mechanics of Profit-Led Inflation

To understand why you can no longer afford groceries, we must first dismantle the orthodox economic defense of recent inflation. Traditionalist financial commentators and certain free-market think tanks desperately argue that the concept of “greedflation” is an economic fallacy. They posit that inflation is purely a monetary phenomenon, driven by central banks flooding the economy with excess liquidity chasing too few goods, coupled with pent-up consumer demand.¹

From this perspective, corporations did not suddenly become “greedier” in 2021; they simply responded to supply constraints and demand spikes.⁹ Proponents of this view, such as analysts at the Cato Institute and the American Institute for Economic Research, argue that the correlation between rising inflation and an increase in corporate profits is a spurious, non-causal relationship.¹⁰ They ask, somewhat mockingly, why consumers have “played ball” by continuing to purchase goods despite price hikes, suggesting that if prices were truly gouged, demand would organically plummet.¹¹

But this classical view is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the modern reality of corporate concentration, inelastic demand for basic food, and raw market power.

Empirical data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and economic policy research indicates that corporate profits contributed significantly to inflation during the pandemic recovery. Let us look at the historical context. Normally, corporate profits account for approximately 11 to 12 percent of price increases in the economy.⁷ However, between the end of 2019 and mid-2022, rising profit margins explained over 40 percent of the rise in the price level.⁷ This is not a normal market response; this is an unprecedented extraction of capital.

The mechanism at play here is termed “Seller’s Inflation” or “profit-led inflation”.⁶ I want you to picture how this actually works in a boardroom. When a small number of upstream industries experience genuine cost shocks—such as higher shipping rates or a lack of microchips—they respond by raising prices in excess of their cost increases.⁶ Downstream firms with significant market power then utilize this widely reported, highly publicized inflationary environment as pretextual cover.⁶

Large cost shocks that hit all competitors function as an implicit coordinating mechanism. Because all firms know their competitors are facing the exact same macroeconomic conditions, they have strong incentives to raise prices uniformly.⁶ They do not need to sit in a smoky back room and illegally fix prices; they simply use the evening news as their coordinating signal.

This dynamic explains the insidious phenomenon of “asymmetric price transmission.” When commodity inputs (like raw wheat, wholesale eggs, or raw milk) spike in price, the retail prices you see at the supermarket skyrocket immediately. But when those same commodity prices eventually plummet back to their historical averages, retail prices remain artificially elevated.¹⁴ The consumer is forced to absorb the shock, but the corporation happily absorbs the windfall.

Designing the Machine: An HR Perspective on Greedflation

Why does this happen? Why do executives risk alienating their consumer base and drawing the ire of antitrust regulators to push prices slightly higher? This is where my 17-year background in corporate Human Resources comes into play. If you want to understand corporate behavior, you do not look at their PR statements or their Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) pledges. You look at their executive compensation architecture.

Corporate behavior is entirely predictable when viewed through the lens of human resources performance metrics and executive incentive plans. The moral cost of profit-led inflation—the human suffering of families unable to afford dinner—is entirely superseded by the fiduciary mandate to maximize short-term shareholder returns. And that mandate is enforced via highly lucrative executive bonuses.

Annual Incentive Plans (AIPs) in the Food and Beverage industry are meticulously designed to reward specific financial performance. Recent research into executive compensation benchmarks for 2026 reveals exactly what behavior boards of directors are paying for. For many FMCG leaders, 70 percent or more of their annual bonus is tied directly to critical financial outcomes such as EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization), Gross Margin expansion, and Net Income.¹⁶

Let that sink in. Seventy percent of a multi-million dollar bonus is dependent on ensuring that the profit margin expands. Payout multipliers for exceeding these revenue and margin benchmarks can reach 150 percent of the target in top-performing companies.¹⁶

If a Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer knows that absorbing a supply chain shock will compress gross margins and effectively annihilate their $10 million performance bonus, what do you think they are going to do? They will invariably choose to pass the costs onto you, the consumer. In fact, they will often add an extra premium on top of the cost increase to ensure the margin actually expands, triggering that 150% payout multiplier.

The proxy statements and compensation reports of major industry players illustrate this reality with stunning clarity. Let’s look at Nestlé’s 2024 compensation report. It explicitly notes that the payout range for their short-term bonus was expanded to a maximum of 150% to “align with market practice”.¹⁷ This ensures that executives are massively rewarded for hitting financial KPIs, regardless of the macroeconomic environment facing their customers.

The U.S. meatpacking sector provides a stark, almost visceral real-world example of these dynamics in action. Over the past few years, the meatpacking industry has been under intense scrutiny for antitrust violations, price fixing, and slashing payments to ranchers while driving up consumer prices.¹⁸ Yet, the executive payouts remain astronomical.

In fiscal year 2024, Tyson Foods’ top five executives shared a staggering $14.439 million in cash bonus pay.²¹ This was explicitly framed as a reward for improved financial metrics, representing a massive increase from the $1.032 million in bonuses tied to the previous fiscal year.²¹ Their CEO, Donnie King, received total compensation valued at $22.773 million, representing a 72.78% gain over 2023.²¹ Chairman John H. Tyson received compensation valued at $18.404 million, up 108% from the prior year.²¹

Even more illustrative of the untouchable nature of the C-suite is the case of John R. Tyson, who served as Chief Financial Officer until June 2024 when he was suspended for a second alcohol-related offense. Despite this, for the time he was CFO in 2024, he earned a total compensation of $5.163 million, which included a base salary bump, over a million dollars in bonus pay, and millions in stock awards.²¹

These monumental payouts occurred concurrently with intense consumer pressure at the meat counter and ongoing antitrust scrutiny over industry pricing practices. While CEOs are awarded lucrative compensation packages tied to margin expansion metrics, the rank-and-file employees face a different reality. Data from proxy season 2024 highlights a 9.3% decrease in compensation among median employees across tracked sectors, highlighting the disproportionate impact on the mid-level managers and skilled workers who actually produce the value.²²

Corporate public relations departments will spend millions promoting their Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs.²³ They will publish glossy reports about sustainability and community engagement. But the objective reality of HR compensation architecture proves that these initiatives are secondary. The “performance-driven” approach to CSR primarily views social responsibility as merely another tool to enhance profitability and brand equity.²⁵

When the fundamental design of executive remuneration financially penalizes leaders for protecting consumer affordability, the inevitable outcome is a corporate culture that views the working-class consumer not as a stakeholder to be served, but as a resource to be optimized and exploited. You get what you measure. And right now, global food companies are measuring greed.

The Global Grain Cartel: The Hegemony of the ABCCDs

The foundation of the entire global food supply rests on agricultural commodities—grain, corn, soy, and sugar. Before the FMCG companies can package your food, and before the supermarkets can sell it to you, the raw ingredients must be harvested, traded, and processed.

This trade of fundamental human necessities is not a free market. It is a tightly controlled oligopoly. Five massive conglomerates—ADM, Bunge, Cargill, COFCO, and Louis Dreyfuss Company, collectively known as the ABCCDs—control between 70 and 90 percent of the global trade in commercial grains.⁵

This extreme market concentration provides these entities with unparalleled bargaining power to shape the global food landscape. The ABCCDs are not merely traders sitting at desks buying and selling futures; they are heavily, aggressively vertically integrated. They control vast networks of contracted suppliers, storage silos, crushing and processing plants, private transport networks, and port terminals all over the globe.⁵ Furthermore, they supply farmers with critical inputs like loans, seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides.⁵

Because they occupy every single node of the supply chain, they possess an insurmountable information advantage. They collect proprietary, real-time data on harvest yields, geopolitical shifts, and local pricing dynamics long before public markets can react. During the height of the recent cost-of-living crisis, this monopoly power yielded extraordinary financial returns.

According to a comprehensive 2024 report by SOMO titled “Hungry for Profits,” the profits of the five biggest agricultural commodity traders tripled in the last three years compared to their average profits from the 2016–2020 period.⁵ Let me be clear: their profits did not just increase; they tripled.

These record profits occurred simultaneously with a global food crisis that pushed millions into acute hunger, fueled by the outbreak of the war in Ukraine which sent food and energy prices skyrocketing.¹ The ability of the ABCCDs to vastly increase their profit margins on highly commoditized, interchangeable goods strongly points to an abuse of market power. Researchers have described this behavior as “oligopolistic price fixing”.⁵ They shamelessly exploited market conditions to artificially inflate prices, using their dominant market position to increase margins even as consumer costs rose globally.

Rather than regulatory intervention fracturing this dangerous consolidation, the trend is moving toward further monopolization. On August 1, 2024, the European Commission approved an unprecedented mega-merger between Bunge and Viterra.⁵ This merger consolidates the global agricultural sector even further, creating an entity with terrifying power over global food security. The fact that this merger was approved without a deeper Phase II investigation shows a profound regulatory failure to protect the global consumer.⁵

While some regulatory bodies are beginning to awaken to this threat—evidenced by recent U.S. Executive Orders establishing Food Supply Chain Security Task Forces to investigate meat-packing cartels for price-fixing and collusion ¹⁸—the structural dominance of these entities remains largely intact. Cargill and Tyson Foods have previously settled lawsuits regarding turkey price-fixing, with Tyson agreeing to pay $4.62 million.²⁸ But to a multi-billion dollar conglomerate, a five-million dollar antitrust settlement is not a deterrent; it is merely a minor operating expense.

Margin Expansion Disguised as Necessity: The FMCG Playbook

Moving downstream from the agricultural commodity traders, the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) giants represent the final layer between raw food inputs and the retail shelf. These are the companies whose logos sit on virtually every item in your pantry.

An examination of the 2024 and 2025 financial disclosures of the world’s largest food corporations, including Unilever, Nestlé, and PepsiCo, provides empirical proof that recent price hikes outpaced inflation and production costs. They did not just recover costs; they expanded their margins.

The data above is highly revealing. Unilever, for example, reported an underlying sales growth of 4.2% in 2024.⁴ More critically, their gross margin increased by a staggering 280 basis points to 46.9%.⁴ In corporate finance, a gross margin expansion of this magnitude during a period characterized by global supply chain volatility and a consumer cost-of-living crisis is a definitive indicator of pricing power being exercised well beyond cost recovery. Unilever utilized these expanded margins to boost brand and marketing investments to 16.1% of turnover, the highest level in over a decade, while expanding underlying operating margins to 20.0%.⁴

Similarly, Nestlé maintained a highly lucrative gross profit margin of 45.6% in 2025.³ PepsiCo’s 2024 earnings release explicitly stated that enhanced “multiyear productivity initiatives” enabled them to deliver improvements in gross margin and operating margin expansion, even while noting “subdued category performance trends” and business disruptions.³¹

This persistent margin expansion is driven by a highly sophisticated, data-driven corporate strategy known as Net Revenue Management (NRM). NRM is a structural approach that FMCG companies use to optimize pricing, packaging, and promotional mix to maximize top-line and bottom-line growth. In recent years, over two-thirds of revenue growth among the top 50 global FMCG companies has been derived from pricing and mix modifications rather than from actual increases in the volume of goods sold.³²

Through NRM, corporations meticulously calculate the maximum price elasticity of consumers. They determine exactly how much prices can be raised, or how much package sizes can be secretly shrunk (shrinkflation), before a consumer absolutely refuses to purchase the item. They approach revenue management as a science, shifting sales to higher-margin premium items and aggressively pulling back trade discounts.³²

However, this strategic reliance on relentless price hikes to drive revenue has begun to backfire in highly sensitive regions. In Southeast Asia and China, multinational FMCG corporations are losing market share.³³ For decades, these MNCs prioritized premiumization, but in today’s post-globalization world characterized by decreased consumer spending, their relentless margin expansion has alienated middle- and lower-income shoppers. They are now losing ground to local competitors who actually compete on price and value.³³ Consumers worldwide are telling researchers that escalating food prices are constraining their ability to purchase healthy food, with 43% of North American respondents finding food prices prohibitively high.³⁴

Case Studies in Asymmetric Price Transmission

The theoretical frameworks of Net Revenue Management and profit-led inflation are best understood through specific, highly documented case studies where input costs and retail prices completely decoupled. When you look at these specific industries, the veil drops, and the mechanism of wealth extraction becomes undeniable.

The Avian Flu Pretext: Cal-Maine Foods and the Egg Crisis

The U.S. egg market between 2022 and 2025 serves as a masterclass in pretextual inflation. As avian flu outbreaks occurred, the narrative heavily promoted to the public by corporate media and the industry was that devastated chicken flocks were causing severe supply shortages, necessitating record-high egg prices. Consumer prices hit $5.90 a dozen in February 2023, almost twice the price of the previous year.³⁵ By March 2025, the average price across the top 15 egg brands reached a staggering record high of $7.50, nearly double pre-pandemic prices.³⁶

However, internal industry data reveals that the supply constraints were grossly exaggerated. In a month-to-month comparison to 2021, the U.S. egg-laying flock was, on average, only 3.82% smaller in 2022, 3.16% smaller in 2023, and 5.18% smaller in 2024.³⁷ A supply drop of roughly 3 to 5 percent cannot mathematically justify a 100 to 200 percent increase in retail prices in a highly competitive market. Furthermore, U.S. egg production has not dipped below per capita consumption in any year between 2021 and the present.³⁷

The financial results of Cal-Maine Foods, which produces 20 percent of the eggs consumed in the U.S., expose the reality. The company’s profits more than tripled compared to the previous year, soaring to nearly eight times their pre-bird flu levels.³⁵ Cal-Maine generated $1 billion in windfall income in just three quarters—profits extracted after accounting for all production, processing, and transport costs.³⁵

During this period, Cal-Maine’s actual egg production remained remarkably stable. The company’s CEO noted in interviews that they came out on the winning end by “maximizing production through a period of high demand and recent acquisitions”.³⁸

This glaring disparity between a minor supply dip and a historic profit explosion finally triggered a civil probe by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) into potential price-fixing and anticompetitive practices among the nation’s largest egg producers.³⁵ The investigation specifically focuses on whether producers leveraged the avian flu as a pretext to artificially restrict supply, coordinate pricing, and manipulate industry benchmarks.³⁹ Cal-Maine formally disclosed in April 2025 that it had received a civil investigative demand regarding the nationwide increases in egg prices.³⁹

The Wheat vs. Bread Disconnect

A similarly glaring disconnect occurred in the baked goods sector. The primary material inputs for bakery products are wheat and other grains. Following the onset of the war in Ukraine in early 2022, global wheat prices surged, peaking mid-year. In response, the Producer Price Index (PPI) for bakery products rose sharply. This, we were told, was a textbook pass-through of costs.

However, from the middle of 2022 through the end of 2023, the price of wheat and other grains decreased sharply as supply chains adjusted, global crop yields improved, and alternate grain corridors opened.¹⁴

Despite this severe drop in core material input costs, the PPI for bakery products did not fall. In fact, over a 3-year period beginning January 2021, the PPI for bakery products increased in 35 out of 36 months.¹⁴ The retreat in raw commodity prices was never passed down to the consumer. Instead, the delta between the falling cost of wheat and the continuously rising retail cost of bread was quietly absorbed into the profit margins of food processors and retailers.¹⁴ By January 2026, grocery store food prices in the U.S. were still rising at 2.1% year-over-year, continuing to strain consumer budgets long after the initial supply chain shocks had resolved.⁴¹

Supply Chain Fractures in the Developing World: The Case of India

While consumers in high-income nations like the United States and the UK face severe budgetary strain from these monopolistic practices, the dynamics of food monopolization and intermediary margin extraction exact a much more devastating, immediate toll in developing economies. In nations with complex, multi-tiered agricultural supply chains like India, extreme weather events compound with aggressive intermediary profiteering to create crippling localized crises.

Let’s look at the Hubballi-Dharwad region of Karnataka, India. Shifting climate patterns and unseasonal rains severely damaged critical crops in 2024 and 2025, providing a genuine initial supply shock.⁴³ The production of dry red chillies—particularly the highly sought-after Byadagi variety—dropped significantly. In the 2023-24 season, dry red chilli production in the state was 320,495 tonnes. By 2024-25, it fell to 219,670 tonnes, and more recently plummeted to an estimated 1.58 lakh tonnes.⁴⁴

This authentic shortage caused wholesale prices to skyrocket. At the Hubli APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee), market rates crossed ₹70,000 per quintal, a steep increase from around ₹45,000 the previous year.⁴⁴ Similarly, the price of basic staples like tomatoes shot up to ₹80 per kilo, and drumsticks reached an exorbitant ₹350 per kilo due to market scarcity.⁴⁵

However, an objective analysis of the Indian agricultural supply chain reveals that the ultimate retail price paid by the consumer is vastly inflated beyond the actual farmgate shortages by market intermediaries. Research into the Indian pulse and cereal supply chains demonstrates that uneven price transmission heavily dominates the traditional marketing system. Market intermediaries, specifically wholesalers and retailers, capture a massive, disproportionate portion of the marketing margin, leading to a 40-50% reduction in the producer’s (the actual farmer’s) share of the final consumer price.¹⁵

To combat this aggressive hoarding and unscrupulous speculation by middlemen, the Government of India is routinely forced to intervene with blunt regulatory instruments. In June 2024, the government imposed strict stock limits on pulses (tur and chana) across all States and Union Territories. Wholesalers were restricted to holding 200 MT, retailers to 5 MT, and big chain retailers were capped at 200 MT at their depots.⁴⁶ Furthermore, importers were banned from holding stock beyond 45 days from customs clearance.⁴⁶ These aggressive government interventions are a direct acknowledgement by state authorities that, left unchecked, the intermediary supply chain will deliberately restrict supply to engineer price spikes and gouge the public.

Data from the Hubli (Amaragol) APMC wholesale market in early 2026 further highlights the volatility. Wholesale prices for black gram (urd beans) fluctuated between ₹59 and ₹67 per kilogram ⁴⁷, while wheat wholesale prices hovered between ₹2000 and ₹3911 per quintal.⁴⁸ Yet, by the time these commodities reached the urban retail consumer, the prices were heavily marked up to account for the margins of multiple handlers, transport networks, and the final retail vendor. Consumers in Hubballi reported scaling back festive purchases, buying staples like Bombay Rava, semolina, and dal in vastly reduced quantities due to relentless retail price creep.⁴⁹

A remarkably similar dynamic exists in the global and Indian dairy sectors. While retail milk prices remain perpetually elevated for consumers, the farmgate prices paid to actual dairy farmers are deeply subject to global commodity pressures and processor bargaining power. In India, average raw milk prices fluctuated wildly in 2025, dropping by nearly 6.7% year-over-year in certain months (down to €0.56/L on average), even as consumer prices held firm.⁵⁰ Globally, in regions like Europe and North America, strong milk production in 2025 led to falling wholesale commodity prices and weakened farmgate returns for producers.⁵¹ Yet, these wholesale cost reductions rarely translate into proportionate relief for the end consumer at the grocery store checkout.

Retail Duopolies: The Australian Supermarket Inquiry

The extraction of margin is not limited to commodity traders and FMCG manufacturers; retail consolidation at the supermarket level plays a pivotal role in enforcing the illusion of inflation. When consumers only have two or three choices of where to buy their food, market forces fail.

In Australia, the supermarket sector is famously dominated by a powerful duopoly: Coles and Woolworths. Amidst widespread public outcry over the cost of groceries and allegations of suppliers being exploited, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) launched a comprehensive 12-month inquiry into supermarket pricing practices and allegations of “price gouging” under the cover of inflation.⁵²

The ACCC’s 2025 final report yielded damning conclusions. It found that Australia’s major supermarkets are highly profitable by international standards.⁵⁴ The earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margins of Coles and Woolworths rank among the absolute highest of supermarket businesses in relevant comparator countries globally.⁵⁴ Their average net profit after tax margins were comparable to global behemoths like Walmart and Tesco.⁵⁴

The inquiry found significant barriers to entry in the sector, resulting in Coles and Woolworths having “limited incentive to compete on price”.⁵⁵ They possess an entrenched market position that allows them to dictate terms to both suppliers and consumers. In response to these findings, the Australian government began drafting exposure legislation to explicitly prohibit excessive pricing by supermarkets, empowering the ACCC with multi-million-dollar penalties to safeguard consumers from entrenched market power.⁵⁵ Laws to protect consumers from excessive prices from companies with market power already exist in the European Union and the UK ⁵⁵, highlighting a growing global consensus that supermarkets can no longer be trusted to self-regulate pricing during crises.

The Ultimate Toll: Global Food Insecurity and Starvation

When we talk about “inflation” and corporate margins, it is easy to get lost in the spreadsheets, the basis points, and the EBITDA multipliers. But as someone who cares deeply about human society and fairness, I cannot look away from the ultimate, catastrophic toll this system extracts from the world’s most vulnerable.

The macroeconomic data, the soaring corporate profit margins, and the supply chain chokepoints all culminate in a profound human tragedy. When global agricultural commodities are financialized and dominated by an oligopoly of traders, and when FMCG and retail giants prioritize historic margin expansion over pricing stability, millions of people are pushed past the breaking point of survival.

According to the 2025 Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC), the compounding effects of economic shocks, conflict, and climate extremes drove acute hunger to catastrophic levels. In 2024, more than 295.3 million people across 53 countries and territories experienced acute levels of food insecurity—an increase of 13.7 million from 2023.² This represents a staggering tripling of the number of people facing acute hunger since 2016, and a doubling since 2020.⁵⁷

The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) explicitly warned that the broad downward trajectory of international food commodity prices since 2023 has done very little to alleviate the persistently high food prices faced by consumers in developing nations.⁵⁸ The report forcefully highlights that high concentration along global food value chains, anti-competitive trade practices, and the financialization of commodity markets actively contribute to elevated consumer prices, keeping vital sustenance out of reach.²⁶

In 2024 and 2025, the number of people facing IPC Phase 5 (Catastrophe)-level food insecurity more than doubled, impacting populations in Sudan, the Gaza Strip, South Sudan, Haiti, and Mali.⁵⁷ Domestic food price inflation remains moderately high across the developing world; in real terms, food price inflation exceeded overall general inflation in 54% of the 166 countries where data is available.⁵⁹

While the ABCCD giants post record, tripled revenues, and while Western FMCG executives receive eight-figure performance bonuses explicitly tied to gross margin expansion, official development assistance (ODA) and humanitarian funding for food crises are simultaneously waning.⁵⁷ The juxtaposition of unprecedented corporate wealth extraction at the top of the food chain against the starvation of nearly 300 million people at the bottom is the starkest, most agonizing indictment of our current agricultural market structure. It is a moral failure of catastrophic proportions.

Restoring Fairness to the Global Food Supply

My analysis of the modern grocery supply chain is meant to strip away the illusion that your current grocery bill is merely the tragic, unavoidable result of natural inflation and invisible macroeconomic forces. The data unequivocally demonstrates that while initial shocks—such as pandemics, geopolitical wars, and weather anomalies—ignited the inflationary spark, powerful corporate entities deliberately poured gasoline on the fire.

The mechanics of “greedflation” are not rooted in some shadowy, illegal conspiracy theory; they are the highly predictable, mathematical byproduct of a consolidated, weakly regulated market operating exactly as its internal HR financial metrics dictate. When five companies control the vast majority of global grain, they possess the structural leverage to dictate terms to the entire planet.⁵ When FMCG executives are contractually bound to receive multi-million-dollar payouts exclusively for expanding gross margins during a crisis, they have a fiduciary imperative to raise prices far beyond the rate of cost inflation.¹⁶ When supermarkets operate as regional duopolies, the consumer has no viable alternative but to absorb the markups or go hungry.⁵⁵

Addressing this crisis requires all of us to move beyond the passive acceptance of corporate PR narratives. It demands rigorous, objective adherence to the rule of law and the aggressive deployment of global antitrust legislation. The steps initiated by the U.S. DOJ to investigate price-fixing in meatpacking and egg production ¹⁸, alongside the Australian government’s move to explicitly outlaw supermarket price gouging with massive penalties ⁵⁵, represent necessary first steps. In the U.S., bridge payments to farmers harmed by market disruptions and unfair trade practices show a recognition that the foundational producers need protection from market consolidated power.⁶⁰

However, systemic stabilization will require much deeper structural reforms. Regulators must block further consolidation in the agricultural sector, fiercely scrutinizing mega-mergers like Bunge and Viterra that threaten to solidify monopolistic control over human survival.⁵ Furthermore, mechanisms to restrict asymmetric price transmission—ensuring that retail prices fall at the exact same velocity they rise when commodity inputs drop—must be explored and enforced.

Ultimately, food is not merely another tradable financial commodity; it is a fundamental human necessity. A free market requires robust, honest competition to function efficiently. When competition is replaced by cartels, and when localized supply shocks are ruthlessly exploited as pretexts for global margin expansion, the market has failed us. Recognizing the illusion of inflation for what it truly is—a massive, coordinated upward transfer of wealth facilitated by market concentration—is the essential prerequisite for restoring fairness, stability, and affordability to the global food supply.

Works cited

1. Greedflation: How Serious a Problem Is It, and What Can Be Done? – International Banker, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://internationalbanker.com/finance/greedflation-how-serious-a-problem-is-it-and-what-can-be-done/
2. Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC) 2025 | World Food Programme, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.wfp.org/publications/global-report-food-crises-grfc
3. Full-year results 2025 | Nestlé Global, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.nestle.com/media/pressreleases/allpressreleases/full-year-results-2025
4. Investor Relations full year 2024 Overview | Unilever, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.unilever.com/investors/results-events/results-events-webcasts/overview-q4-2024/
5. Hungry for profits – Monopoly power in global agriculture – SOMO, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.somo.nl/hungry-for-profits/
6. Profit-Led Inflation: Trivial or Wrong? – Cato Institute, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.cato.org/commentary/profit-led-inflation-trivial-or-wrong
7. Profits and price inflation are indeed linked | Economic Policy Institute – EPI.org, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.epi.org/blog/profits-and-price-inflation-are-indeed-linked/
8. Last Word: Busting the “Greedflation” Myth | Cato Institute, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.cato.org/free-society/last-word-busting-greedflation-myth
9. Fact-Checking “Greedflation” | The Daily Economy, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/fact-checking-greedflation/
10. Unmasking Greedflation: Debunking the Neo-Brandeisian Narrative | ITIF, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://itif.org/publications/2024/05/29/unmasking-greedflation-debunking-neobrandeisian-narrative/
11. Three Big Strikes against ‘Greedflation’ – Cato Institute, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.cato.org/commentary/three-big-strikes-against-greedflation
12. Ag and Food Statistics: Charting the Essentials – Food Prices and Spending – ers.usda.gov, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/food-prices-and-spending
13. Markups, Profit Shares, and Cost-Push-Profit-Led Inflation, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/markups-profit-shares-and-cost-push-profit-led-inflation/
14. What is behind the rise in prices for bakery products? – BLS.gov, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-14/bakery-products-btn.htm
15. Pulse Value Chains in India- Challenges and Prospects: A Review – ARCC Journals, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.arccjournals.com/journal/legume-research-an-international-journal/LR-4632
16. Executive Compensation Benchmarks in the Food & Beverage Industry 2026 – JRG Partners, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.jrgpartners.com/executive-compensation-benchmarks-food-beverage-industry-2026/
17. Compensation Report 2024 – Nestlé, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.nestle.com/sites/default/files/2025-02/nestle-corporate-governance-compensation-report-2024-en.pdf
18. 20251210 New Executive Order Demands Antitrust Crackdown on the Food Supply Chain, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/client-alerts/20251211-new-executive-order-demands-antitrust-crackdown-on-the-food-supply-chain
19. Fact-checking Trump’s call for an investigation into meatpacking companies, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://investigatemidwest.org/2025/11/18/fact-checking-trumps-call-for-an-investigation-into-meatpacking-companies/
20. International: New US Executive Order Signals Heightened Antitrust Scrutiny in the Food Supply Chain Sector for Foreign-Controlled Companies – Global Compliance News, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.globalcompliancenews.com/2026/01/02/https-insightplus-bakermckenzie-com-bm-antitrust-competition_1-international-new-executive-order-signals-heightened-antitrust-scrutiny-in-the-food-supply-chain-sector_12102025/
21. Tyson Foods’ top five execs collect $14.439 million in bonus pay – Talk Business & Politics, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://talkbusiness.net/2024/12/tyson-foods-top-five-execs-collect-14-439-million-in-bonus-pay/
22. An Early Look at CEO Pay Trends From Proxy Season 2024, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2024/04/18/an-early-look-at-ceo-pay-trends-from-proxy-season-2024/
23. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Performance in the Food Industry in Saudi Arabia: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach – MDPI, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/7925
24. The impact of corporate social responsibility on firms’ financial performance, evidence from the food and beverage industry – Emerald Publishing, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.emerald.com/bfj/article-split/122/1/1/41278/The-impact-of-corporate-social-responsibility-on
25. Corporate social responsibility and performance in the workplace: a meta-analysis – PMC, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10006573/
26. Trade and development report 2024: Rethinking development in the age of discontent – UNCTAD, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdr2024_en.pdf
27. ‘Big Four’ meatpackers under fire as beef prices soar – The Guardian, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/feb/25/beef-packers-under-fire-prices-soar
28. Cargill reaches $32M settlement in turkey price-fixing lawsuit – Agriculture Dive, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.agriculturedive.com/news/cargill-settles-turkey-price-fixing-lawsuit/737859/
29. Latest results | Unilever, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.unilever.com/investors/results-events/results-events-webcasts/latest-results/
30. Nestlé releases 2025 financial results, strategic update – Global Coffee Report, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.gcrmag.com/nestle-releases-2025-financial-results-strategic-update/
31. PepsiCo Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2024 Results; Provides 2025 Financial Outlook; Announces Annual Dividend Increase, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.pepsico.com/docs/pepsico-5v9wci20/media/Files/investors/q4-2024-earnings-release.pdf
32. How Net Revenue Management Boosts Top and Bottom Lines – Boston Consulting Group, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/consumer-products-pricing-how-net-revenue-management-boosts-top-bottom-line
33. A Crisis of Value in China and Southeast Asia | Bain & Company, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.bain.com/insights/a-crisis-in-value-in-china-and-southeast-asia/
34. Voice of the Consumer 2025 | PwC Global, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/voice-of-the-consumer-survey.html
35. US’s biggest egg producer’s profits triple as prices soar – The Guardian, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/09/doj-egg-prices-rise-cal-maine-profits
36. Egg Prices Dip After Record Highs; Cal-Maine Faces Investigation – Earnest Analytics, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.earnestanalytics.com/insights/egg-prices-dip-after-record-highs
37. Farm Action Calls for an Investigation into Skyrocketing Egg Prices and Restricted Supply, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://farmaction.us/farm-action-calls-for-an-investigation-into-skyrocketing-egg-prices-and-restricted-supply/
38. Largest US egg seller reports record profits amid DOJ investigation – YouTube, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf7UlVlmnkc
39. Price-Fixing Investigation | Grabar Law Office, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://grabarlaw.com/the-latest/egg-pricing-investigation/
40. A/80/120 – General Assembly – the United Nations, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://docs.un.org/en/A/80/120?direct=true
41. Are groceries more expensive than last year? – USAFacts, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://usafacts.org/articles/are-groceries-more-expensive-than-last-year/
42. Food Price Outlook – Summary Findings | Economic Research Service – ers.usda.gov, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-price-outlook/summary-findings
43. Farmers issue warning amid stunning price spike for key food items: ‘It’s not happy news for us’, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.thecooldown.com/sustainable-food/karnataka-rain-vegetable-farmers-vendors/
44. Too hot to handle: Dry red chilli prices see a sharp spike – The Times of India, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubballi/too-hot-to-handle-dry-red-chilli-prices-see-a-sharp-spike/articleshow/127891321.cms
45. As mercury level dips, veggie prices go through the roof in Bengaluru – The Hindu, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/as-mercury-level-dips-veggie-prices-turn-too-hot-to-handle/article70346167.ece
46. Centre imposes stock limits on tur and chana, including kabuli chana, until 30th September, 2024, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2027694
47. Black Gram(urd Beans)(whole) Rate Today In Hubli (amaragol) Apmc – Live Market Prices And Trends – KisanDeals, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.kisandeals.com/mandiprices/BLACK-GRAM(URD-BEANS)(WHOLE)/KARNATAKA/HUBLI-(AMARAGOL)-APMC
48. Wheat Rate Today In Hubli (amaragol) – Live Market Prices And Trends – KisanDeals, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.kisandeals.com/mandiprices/WHEAT/KARNATAKA/HUBLI-(AMARAGOL)
49. Festive Season: Impact of Rising Grocery Prices on Festival Celebrations in Hubballi and Dharwad – The Times of India, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubballi/impact-of-rising-grocery-prices-on-festival-celebrations-in-hubballi-and-dharwad/articleshow/113005941.cms
50. Raw Milk prices average, India – CLAL, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.clal.it/en/index.php?section=india-raw-milk
51. Farmgate Milk Price Trend and Forecast – Procurement Resource, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.procurementresource.com/resource-center/farmgate-milk-price-trends
52. Final report – ACCC, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.accc.gov.au/inquiries-and-consultations/finalised-inquiries/supermarkets-inquiry-2024-25/final-report
53. Supermarkets inquiry 2024-25 – ACCC, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.accc.gov.au/inquiries-and-consultations/finalised-inquiries/supermarkets-inquiry-2024-25
54. ACCC finds Australia’s supermarkets are among the world’s most profitable – but doesn’t accuse them of price gouging – QUT, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.qut.edu.au/news/realfocus/accc-finds-australias-supermarkets-are-among-the-worlds-most-profitable
55. Consultation on making supermarket price gouging illegal – Treasury Ministers, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/andrew-leigh-2025/media-releases/consultation-making-supermarket-price-gouging-illegal
56. Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC) 2025, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.fightfoodcrises.net/report/global-report-food-crises-2025/
57. 2025 Global Report on Food Crises: Rising food insecurity, waning humanitarian assistance, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.ifpri.org/blog/2025-global-report-on-food-crises-rising-food-insecurity-waning-humanitarian-assistance/
58. Trade and Development Update (April 2024) – UNCTAD, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/gdsinf2024d1_en.pdf
59. Food Security | Food Insecurity Statistics & Solutions – World Bank, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/food-security-update
60. Trump Administration Announces $12 Billion Farmer Bridge Payments for American Farmers Impacted by Unfair Market Disruptions | USDA, accessed on March 6, 2026, https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2025/12/08/trump-administration-announces-12-billion-farmer-bridge-payments-american-farmers-impacted-unfair